Governance Models and Stunting: Comparative Policy Insights from Indonesia, Malaysia, and Mexico

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24258/jba.v21i3.1710

Abstract

162 million children worldwide are affected by stunting, which has serious societal repercussions (WHO, 2021). In order to identify institutional drivers of success, this study compares the governance styles used to address stunting in Mexico (hybrid), Malaysia (centralised), and Indonesia (decentralised). Through a qualitative examination of 45 coverage documents (2015–2023) and 72 stakeholder interviews, we find that Malaysia's NPAN uses cross-regional cooperation to reduce stunting by 12%, while Indonesia's bureaucratic fragmentation hinders implementation. The importance of network engagement is emphasized in Mexico's PENSAN application. By showing how adaptive frameworks that are adapted to local capacities improve fitness outcomes, the study advances the idea of collaborative governance. Malaysia is a prime example of a collaborative governance model that involves a few
stakeholders and improves its national nutrition strategy. Mexico's comprehensive strategy, which combines health and social regulations, underscores the significance of community engagement in public health initiatives. A comparative analysis of stunting incidence indicates that Indonesia (20.0%) and Malaysia (24.3%) face significant challenges in reducing stunting rates, whereas Mexico (13.9%) has made greater progress in this area. This study gives contribution to the study of public administration by illustrating how centralized (Malaysia), decentralized (Indonesia), and hybrid (Mexico) governance systems influence the effectiveness of health interventions. It provides critical insights for policymakers and practitioners, advocating for inclusive stakeholder participation and the necessity of context specific solutions. This study redefines discussions on decentralization in global health governance and fills the gap on cross-national governance analyses in stunting policy. This study indicates that policymakers ought to promote institutional flexibility and participatory design to attain SDG objectives.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Rozita Arshad, Universiti Utara Malaysia

Assoc. Prof. Dr. Rozita Arshad. She is a Senior Lecturer (Associate Professor) at the School of Government, College of Law, Government and International Studies, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010, Sintok, Kedah Darul Aman. Her Email: roz@uum.edu.my, Phone: +628179200922, and ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2739-8161. She had some positions as the Deputy Director  Research and Innovation Management Centre (RIMC), from January 2018; Quality Manager Center of Quality Management, January – December 2017;  Postgraduate Programme Coordinator, January 2013-December 2014; Head, Public Management Programme College of Law, Government and International Studies, January 2011-December 2012; and Senior Lecturer, Faculty of Public Management and Law (1999 - present).

Vivian Kadelbach, Universidad Anahuac Mexico

Prof. Vivian Kadelbach She is Profesora investigadora, Universidad Anahuac Mexico, Universidad Anáhuac México Norte, 2011-01 to present Profesora Investigadora employment, Daimler Financial Services AG, 2006-01 to 2008-01 Chief of Staff employment. Her email: vkadelbach@anahuac.mx, Phone: +52 5566952106, ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8008-3402. Getting Ph.D. in education from Universidad Anáhuac México Norte, 2008-01 to 2010-12. Her MBA education from Arizona State University Thunderbird School of Global Management, 2003 01 to 2004-01. Lic. rer. pol. Education from Université de Fribourg Département de gestion, 1991-09 to 1996-02.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

Dwiputrianti, S., Balian, M. U., Arshad, R., Kadelbach, V., & Abdullah, S. (2025). Governance Models and Stunting: Comparative Policy Insights from Indonesia, Malaysia, and Mexico. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 21(3), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.24258/jba.v21i3.1710