Evaluasi Kebijakan Pencalonan Anggota DPRD Dalam Penyelengaraan Pemilu Tahun 2014
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24258/jba.v12i3.256Abstract
The nomination policy of local parliament members in general election is regulated in various policies by the Central Parliament, the President and the Election Commission. In order to improve the election quality, policy evaluation is required. This study uses legal research/normative methods and library/documentary study of the policies content. It is found out that there are some different aspects in managing the nomination of local parliament members in Law No. 8 of 2012 and some Election Commission/KPU’s regulations. Substantively, there are several provisions that are ambiguous, multi-interpretative, contradictious, and are not implementable. This problem causes local election commissions cannot optimally perform theirs tasks. Therefore, it is recommended to have policy revision in several aspects, such as education qualification, physical and spiritual health, authorized health agency, political liaison officers, resignation certificate or decree from certain positions at public agencies (such as civil servant, military, police, etc.) and other institutions to avoid conflict of interest, nomination forms, and several errors/ inconsistencies terms.
Keywords: policy evaluation, local parliament nomination, general election.
Pencalonan anggota DPRD dalam pemilu diatur dalam berbagai kebijakan yang ditetapkan DPR, Presiden dan KPU. Untuk penyelenggaraan yang makin berkualitas di masa yang akan datang, diperlukan evaluasi kebijakan. Dengan metode penelitian hukum/hukum normatif dan teknik studi kepustakaan/dokumenter terhadap isi/substansi kebijakan diketahui adanya berbagai aspek pengaturan pencalonan anggota DPRD, yang termuat dalam UU Nomor 8 Tahun 2012 dan beberapa produk kebijakan KPU yang pada dasarnya merupakan kebijakan publik. Secara substantif terdapat beberapa ketentuanyang bersifat tidak jelas, multiinterpretatif, kontradiktif dan tidak implementatif. Kondisi ini mengakibatkan para penyelenggara pemilu di daerah tidak dapat melaksanakan tugas pelayanan pencalonan secara lebih optimal. Untuk itu, direkomendasikan perlu adanya penyempurnaan terhadap substansi beberapa aspek pencalonan anggota DPRD, yang meliputi ijazah/STTB, surat keterangan sehat jasmani dan rohani, institusi pemberi surat keterangan sehat, petugas penghubung parpol dengan penyelenggara pemilu, surat keterangan atau surat keputusan pemberhentian dalam kedudukan/jabatan tertentu (PNS, TNI, Polri, dan sebagainya), surat pernyataan pengunduran diri, badan lain yang anggarannya dari keuangan negara, pekerjaan lain yang tidak menimbulkan konflik kepentingan, beberapa contoh formulir/model pencalonan dan beberapa kesalahan/ inkonsistensi peristilahan.
Kata kunci: evaluasi kebijakan, pencalonan anggota DPRD, pemilihan umum.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Author(s)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Policy for Journals That Offer Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).








