Institutional Pluralism Sistem Peradilan Indonesia dan Kekuatan Negara di Era Globalisasi
Institutional Pluralism of Indonesia’s Justice System and State’s Power in Globalization Era
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24258/jba.v15i3.436Abstract
This article comes from the argument saying that the main indicator for measuring a state’s power is based on its endurance survival. Borrowing the concepts developed by International Relations and Public Administration, this article aims to describe the concept of a state’s power and its relations to administrative setting. Traditionally, state’s power is measured by its ability to affect the environment (external), however, the contemporary trend suggests that state’s power is leaning more and more towards the state ability to serve the demand of its people(internal)One of the global issues concerns to the ability of a state to fulfill justice and security internally. In Indonesian context, its judicial system and institutions revolve around three main institutions, the Supreme Court, the Constitutional Court, and the Judicial Commission. The institutional reform of Indonesia's justice system is intended to maintain accountability and reflect an institutional pluralism model. However, the model does not necesarily create a high level of public confidence towards the Indonesian judicial system, and later, it will affect Indonesia’s survivability.
Keywords: Judicial System and Institutions of Indonesia, Institutional Pluralism, State’s Power, Survivability
Abstrak
Artikel ini bertitik tolak dari argumen yang mengatakan bahwa indikator utama dari kekuatan suatu negara adalah sejauh mana ia bisa menjaga eksistensinya (survival). Meminjam konsep-konsep yang dikembangkan dalam studi Hubungan Internasional dan Administrasi Publik, artikel ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan konsep kekuatan Negara serta hubungannya dengan tatanan administratif dari suatu Negara tersebut. Jika secara tradisional kekuatan Negara sering kali diukur melalui kemampuan untuk memengaruhi lingkungan (eksternal), maka kecenderungan yang terjadi pada era kontemporer menunjukkan bahwa konsep kekuatan negara perlahan semakin bergeser pada penekanan terkait kemampuan Negara tersebut untuk melayani tuntutan masyarakatnya (internal). Salah satu isu global yang yang menjadi perhatian adalah kemampuan Negara untuk memenuhi rasa keadilan dan keamanan (order, justice dan security) di tengah masyarakat. Dalam konteks Indonesia, sistem dan lembaga peradilan berfokus pada tiga institusi yakni Mahkamah Agung, Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Komisi Yudisial. Reformasi kelembagaan sistem peradilan Indonesia dimaksudkan untuk menjaga akuntabilitas serta merefleksikan model institutional pluralism. Meski demikian, model tersebut tidak serta merta berdampak pada tingginya kepercayaan publik terhadap sistem peradilan Indonesia, dan pada gilirannya akan berpengaruh terhadap survivability Indonesia.
Kata Kunci: Sistem dan Lembaga Peradilan Indonesia, Institutional Pluralism, Kekuatan Negara, Survivabilitas
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Author(s)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Policy for Journals That Offer Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).








